Top-ten papers in pneumonia (2020-2021).

Despite the fact that the last year has been marked by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there have been many articles published on non-COVID pneumonia. Making the selection has not been easy, having based on those articles that we think can bring us some novelty and help in clinical practice. We have divided the selection into seven sections: patient severity, diagnosis, treatment, ventilation, novelties in the guidelines, fungal infection and organ donation.

Impact of combined non-invasive support strategies use during acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of combined non-invasive support strategies in critically ill COVID-19 patients [high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) or both]. Method(s): Prospective observational multicenter study in 73 Spanish ICU with data obtained from the SEMICYUC registry. All confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted due to respiratory failure were included. They were classified according to the ventilatory strategy used on admission and subsequently according to success, failure, or strategy change. Demographic data, comorbidities, severity at admission, respiratory, biomarkers, failure, length of stay and mortality were evaluated. Result(s): We analyzed 3,889 patients, 33% receiving HFNC, and 11% NIV at ICU admission. NIV group compared to HFNC were more severely ill with more shock on admission. When NIV was received as a first-choice higher failure rates and mortality were shown vs HFNC (68% vs 61%, p=0.016 and 27% vs 20%, p=0.003). Among patients who initially received HFNC, 57% failed and 7.4% switched to NIV, with no change in mortality. Among patients who were switched to NIV, 66% failed presenting a higher mortality trend than the intubated patients after the HFNC starting (40% vs 30%, p=0.098). Among patients who initially received NIV, 60% failed and 20% switched to HFNC. Patients in whom NIV was switched to HFNC, had lower mortality than patients who initially failed (18% vs 40%, p<0.001). Among patients who were switched to HFNC, 43% failed, presenting the same mortality as the intubated patients after the NIV starting (38% vs 38%, p=0.934). Conclusion(s): Patients receiving NIV at admission have worse outcomes than those receiving HFNC. Changing the strategy in patients who received HFNC as a first choice without success can worsen the prognosis.

Security and Safety as a Key Factor for Smart Tourism Destinations: New Management Challenges in Relation to Health Risks

The competitiveness of a smart tourist destination is based on its natural and cultural attractions, its tourism infrastructures and facilities, and the quality of the services it has to offer. These services include security and safety, both of which are key elements in the tourist’s choice of destination. The aim of this paper is to analyse the elements that make up the concepts of security and safety in tourism. Then, a review of the existing literature on security and safety is carried out and a risk classification is presented. A distinction has been made between territorial, socio-economic and political risks as well as the action measures to fight them. In addition, the key factors that influence the tourist’s perception of security have also been addressed. Beyond the personality traits of an individual, other factors such as the visibility and tangibility of how dangerous the risk is, the information about security or the public administration’s capacity to address risks has also been considered. Furthermore, the evolution of security and safety issues in the tourist context has been studied up until the current, unprecedented, situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, together with the importance of knowing how to address new management challenges when faced with health risks. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

[Update of the care model in a urogynaecology unit of a tertiary hospital: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on face-to-face care]. / Cambio del modelo asistencial en una unidad de uroginecología de un hospital de tercer nivel: impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en la presencialidad.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a sudden change in the usual care practice of our urogynaecology unit. Therefore, we designed a new healthcare model to adapt our practice to the epidemiological situation. The central axis of the new model was reduced hospital attendance, offering the same healthcare quality through the introduction of telemedicine.To achieve this aim, we made the following changes: a first telematic medical visit was the first step, telematic monitoring visits for conservative and pharmacological treatments and pack visit. We created the following packs: LUTS, postpartum and post-discharge pack. All packs included visits and diagnostic tests performed on the same day.The LUTS pack is indicated in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms, associated or not with pelvic organ prolapse. It includes two visits (nursing and medical) and two tests (urodynamics and pelvic floor ultrasound).The postpartum pack is indicated in women with symptoms of urinary incontinence, anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and sexual disfunctions after delivery, as well as asymptomatic patients with a history of obstetric perineal trauma. It includes a medical visit, a pelvic floor ultrasound and a visit with the physiotherapist.The post-discharge pack is scheduled a month after the surgery and includes two tests (pelvic floor ultrasound and uroflowmetry) and a medical visit.Some face-to-face visits were maintained, as were physiotherapy treatments and other visits following medical criteria.

Cambio del modelo asistencial en una unidad de uroginecología de un hospital de tercer nivel: impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en la presencialidad Update of the care model in a urogynaecology unit of a tertiary hospital: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on face-to-face care

La pandemia COVID-19 generó un cambio de forma brusca en la práctica asistencial habitual de nuestra Unidad de Uroginecología, y a raíz de esta situación se ideó un nuevo modelo asistencial para adaptarnos a la nueva etapa epidemiológica. Se acordó, como eje central del nuevo modelo, la disminución de la presencialidad hospitalaria, ofreciendo la misma calidad asistencial mediante la introducción de la telemedicina.Para conseguir tal fin, se elaboró un modelo con tres tipos de visitas nuevas: primera visita médica telemática, visitas de seguimiento de tratamientos conservadores y farmacológicos telemáticas, y creación de visita pack (pack STUI, el pack postparto y el pack post-alta) que incluye visitas y pruebas diagnósticas uroginecológicas que se realizan todas el mismo día. El pack STUI va dirigido a todas las pacientes con síntomas del tracto urinario inferior (STUI), asociados o no a prolapso de órganos pélvicos. Consta de dos visitas (enfermería y médica), y dos pruebas diagnósticas avanzadas (urodinamia y ecografía de suelo pélvico).El pack postparto va dirigido a mujeres con síntomas de incontinencia urinaria, incontinencia anal, prolapso y/o alteraciones de la sexualidad tras el parto. También incluye mujeres asintomáticas con antecedente de trauma perineal obstétrico. Consta de una visita médica, una ecografía de suelo pélvico y una visita por la fisioterapeuta.El pack post-alta se realiza al mes de la cirugía e incluye dos pruebas (ecografía de suelo pélvico y flujometría) y una visita médica.Los tratamientos de fisioterapia y otras visitas que por motivos médicos lo requirieran, han mantenido su presencialidad.

[How did COVID-19 pandemic change the way we attend the patients in an urogynaecological unit]. / Cómo la pandemia por COVID-19 ha cambiado la forma de atender a las pacientes en una unidad de uroginecología.

The current SARS-coronavirus type 2 pandemic caused, in few weeks, important changes in the health system organization and in the way we attend the patients. Urogynaecological diseases affect quality of life, but without life risk in most cases, so it is possible to delay. Moreover, urogynaecological diseases affect mostly women over 65 years old (a high risk population for contracting COVID-19). In this manuscript we summarise the current evidence about telemedicine efectivity to manage to pelvic floor dysfunctions and, in addition, the recommendations of Urogynaecological scientific societies during state of alarm. We describe the management of the different pelvic floor dysfunctions during COVID-19 pandemic and a proposal to organize the urogynaecological services to diagnose (visits and diagnostic investigations) and to treat (conservative, pharmacological or surgery) in the interpandemic period and in the future.